Search This Blog

17 July 2016

Sam’s Estimate: An Assessment of Black Lives Matter

By Sam Frescoe
http://samfrescoeproject.blogspot.com/
 
Welcome to the first installment of Sam’s Estimate. Sam’s Estimate is an evaluation, assessment, or appraisal of a particular issue, organization, or topic. Typically, items of interest are selected from the current American discourse; however, some are selected otherwise. The Estimate attempts to combine facts and philosophy in a thoughtful manner.
Opinion: a view or judgment formed about something, not necessarily based on fact or knowledge
Perspective: a particular attitude toward, or way of regarding, something; a point of view
Fact: a piece of information presented as having objective reality
Philosophy: pursuit of wisdom; an analysis of the grounds of and concepts expressing fundamental beliefs
Sam’s Estimate offers the opinions and perspectives of the author. Facts are cited and philosophy is championed as mechanisms to inform those opinions and perspectives. While the rigor demonstrated by The Estimate is not satisfactory for a comprehensive defense, this post is not intended to declare a matter “settled.” – Sam Frescoe
 
From the American Discourse
Black Lives Matter (BLM) is the subject for this installment of Sam’s Estimate. BLM has been present in the American discourse for some time now: from Ferguson, MO to New York, NY, to Dallas, TX, points in between, and overseas. During that time I’ve observed the media associate BLM with loud demonstrations, peaceful marches, violent riots, and quiet sit-ins. Then, on 8 July 2016, media outlets began holding up BLM as an ideological justification for the premeditated destruction of human life. This change in scope is alarming, and why I selected Black Lives Matter as the subject.
This Post is based on the following Black Lives Matter publications (12 July 2016).
Getting Started
This post presents the Assessment in the following order: BLUF, sentiment, the Assessment, and supporting comments. This post attempts to address three questions: What is Black Lives Matter? Who is Black Lives Matter? Why is Black Lives Matter significant?  Arrangements and sentiments associated with BLM are also discussed. There are bulleted statements throughout the post that contain my thoughts, opinions and perspectives.
·         After an initial review of their web site, it became clear that race, racists, and racism are cornerstone ideas that BLM believes to be tangible, objective realities. So, before going forward, I want to take some time to define terms.
o   Race: (n) an arbitrary classification of modern humans, sometimes, especially formerly, based on any or a combination of various physical characteristics, as skin color, facial form, or eye shape, and now frequently based on such genetic markers as blood groups.[1]
o   Racist: (n) a person who believes in racism, the doctrine that one's own racial group is superior or that a particular racial group is inferior to the others.[2]
o   Racism: (n) a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human racial groups determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to dominate others or that a particular racial group is inferior to the others. – (n) a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination. – (n) hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.[3]
·         Based on the total of the BLM website, I am willing to assume the following: BLM is focused on the plight of human beings; BLM intends to champion particular views, those of “Black” persons; and that the term “liberation” is intended to convey a form of deliverance and revolutionary intent.
·         To better understand the breadth and depth of particular phrases, and sets of statements as a whole, I employ an examination of synonyms; and then, attempt to reconstruct the spirit and intent of the original thoughts using those synonyms. This is not an attempt to put words in their mouths; whereas, an attempt to understand their thoughts.
Bottom Line Up Front
·         Black Lives Matter is popular.
·         Black Lives Matter is active.
·         Black Lives Matter is appealing.
·         Black Lives Matter is dangerous.

Popular Sentiment 
“I support BLM's cause, but not its approach.” – Barbara Reynolds [1]

·         Reynolds is an ordained minister and the author of six books, including the first unauthorized biography of the Rev. Jesse Jackson.

 

“…there are those who created the atmosphere of blind hatred…racist institutions such as the Black Lives Matter movement. All such demagogues need is a situation where there has been a confrontation where someone was white and someone else was black. The facts don’t matter to them.” – Thomas Sowell [2]

·         Thomas Sowell is an American economist, social theorist, political philosopher, and author.

 

“…facts and evidence mean nothing to the Black Lives Matter movement…” – Ben Shapiro [3]

·         Benjamin Aaron "Ben" Shapiro is an American conservative political commentator, nationally syndicated columnist, author, radio talk show host, and attorney.

 

“I consider this movement a love movement. At its core, Black Lives Matter is a movement that fights for the freedom and justice of black people in a world where these basic rights weren’t afforded to men and women like Trayvon Martin, Eric Garner, Sandra Bland, Michael Brown, Freddie Gray and countless others.” – Jesse Williams [4]

·         Jesse Wesley Williams (born August 5, 1981) is an American actor, model, and activist, best known for his role as Dr. Jackson Avery on the ABC Television series Grey's Anatomy.[5]

 

“What are the American rights not afforded to black citizens? – Injustice to one American is an injustice to all.” – Sam Frescoe.

·         On 27 Jun 2016, in response to Jesse Williams BET Humanitarian Award speech, this comment was posted on two Facebook pages: the Karen Civil page, the Huffington Post page. The estimated page-level exposure included 2.5M views, 45K shares, 3K comments, and 21K reactions. Three individuals replied.

·         “Alot” – Dana, a black female that expresses an interest in men.

·         “If you are seriously asking the question, then you are part of the problem he was talking about.” – Kevin, a black male and homicide detective.

·         “Congrats…u said nothing.” – Stephanie, a white female, wife, and mother.

 

Sam’s Assessment
Black Lives Matter (BLM) is social-political movement with a discernable organizational structure. BLM has an actual and virtual presence in modern American discourse.
-       BLM is popular with mainstream media. This recurring exposure contributes to its rise as a popular face for social rebellion.
-       BLM is a well-organized, chapter-based, inter-state organization within the United States. BLM also enjoys recognition overseas.
-       BLM is primarily reserved for black persons, black membership, and on message black ideas. BLM clearly states that #BlackLivesMatter is for “Black lives.” BLM openly discriminates in favor of black persons.
-       The BLM movement is antagonistic, disruptive, and aligned outside social norms.
-       BLM was founded by three black women. All three are activists. Two are writers published with left-leaning media outlets. One is a community organizer. None practice an analytic or empirical profession. None are aligned within institutions that provide societal stability.
-       Black Lives Matter is associated with #BlackLivesMatter. #BlackLivesMatter is a virtual/online discussion forum. It seems clear that BLM intends to use this virtual space as a means to speak, organize, and associate.
-       BLM is an anti-white movement.
 
A foundational belief of Black Lives Matter is that black people experience physical, political, economic, and social violence sanctioned by the government; black people are powerless to stand against that violence.
-       BLM believes actors not aligned with BLM intend to eliminate black people.
-       BLM believes they have a responsibility to legitimize the existence of black people in society.
-       BLM believes its governing principles are philosophically pure, and their motives are morally straight. In turn, any opinion or action not aligned with BLM messaging is attributable to the influence of white persons (White supremacy), past and present.
-       BLM believes they are accountable to Black people in general.
 
Black Lives Matter intends to execute a type of campaign that encompasses black persons (and society at large by extension). The campaign is expected to be radical (outside the norm) in its nature.
-       BLM intends to realize revolutionary social effects.
-       BLM intends to mount political campaigns to assert the legitimacy and authority of black people, exclusively. It is expected for objectives to focus on advocating for new cultural goals to be achieved by new institutional means in order to touch the populace in a radical way.
-       BLM intends to leverage the perceived authority of black people in society.
-       BLM leadership is limited to black persons of their choosing.
-       BLM intends to silence moderate messaging and non-conforming dissent.
 
Black Lives Mater recruits black persons in common society, and seeks to recruit those aligned with fringe segments. Particular focus is paid to those that are likely to harbor resentment towards societal norms. A leading attraction for new recruits may be the intent of BLM to provide actionable opportunities for black persons to act out in a “legitimate” way. Thus, building their constituent base by leveraging pre-existing resentful attitudes held by some black persons.
 
Black Lives Matter claims to “affirm” black lives; not all lives, black lives. BLM seeks messaging favorable to black persons, black contributions, black women, black gender dysphoria, and itself.
-       BLM has established a war-like footing against society at large by condemning its non-black members for institutionalizing the dogma of murdering black people.
-       BLM proclaims to be against anti-black racism; and, proclaims its intent to be exclusively Black in its beliefs, intentions, and memberships. In one hand, BLM states an objective wrong (anti-black racism is systemic in society, no exceptions) in the name of an objective truth (blacks have the right to live). In the other, BLM states a subjective belief (racism is everywhere) as a way of couching a commonly held experience (being dehumanized). However, if both proclamations are regarded with equal moral weight, then a reasoned approach that guides decisions regarding right and wrong, good and evil, virtuousness and viciousness may not be strong enough to instill a reverence for universal principles, morals, or values.
-       Given current events in the United States, and the lack of condemnation by BLM leadership for violence done in the name of BLM, I recommend a renewed concern about their willingness to violate the natural rights of every American citizen (life, liberty, pursuit of wealth) in the name of “black” justice.

 
 
What is Black Lives Matter?

Black Lives Matter (BLM) claims to be a “chapter-based national organization working for the validity of Black life” and focused on “working to (re)build the Black liberation movement.” [1]

·         The “chapter-based” claim seems to be true. The BLM website lists 37 chapters in the United States and one chapter in Canada.[2]

·         The phrase “validity of Black life” seems to be speaking to the natural right to exist.

o   Synonyms for “validity” include legitimacy, power, authority, and force.

o   Synonyms for “life” include existence and being.

o   Therefore, could the phrase be reconstructed in the following ways? – “legitimacy of existing as black people” or “authority of being black people”.

·         What does the phrase “(re)build the Black liberation movement” mean? I associate this phrase with accountability or intent.

o   Synonyms for “build” include shape, construct, and create.

o   The term “liberation movement” implies a crusade with a deviance characterized by new cultural goals achieved through new institutional means. There seems to be intent to touch everyone in a radical way.

o   Therefore, could the phrase be reconstructed in the following ways? – “shape/reshape a new, socially encompassing, radical crusade for black people” or “construct/reconstruct a new, socially encompassing, radical crusade for black people” or “create/recreate a new, socially encompassing, radical crusade for black people”.

Taken together, it seems reasonable to me to conclude Black Lives Matter is defined by the following points.

·         BLM is a wide-spread chapter-based organization.

·         BLM believes they are accountable to Black people in general.

·         BLM believes they have a responsibility to legitimize the existence of black people in society.

·         BLM intends to execute a type of crusade that is new and distinct, that encompasses black persons (and others by extension), and is radical (outside the norm) in its nature.

·         BLM intends to leverage the authority of black people because they exist in society.

·         BLM discriminates in favor of black persons; therefore, is a racist organization.

 

BLM Position #1

BLM claims to be a movement to resist dehumanization of black people. They are focused on responding to the virulent anti-Black racism that permeates American society. [3]

·         What does the phrase “resist dehumanization of black people” mean?

o   Synonyms for “resist” include fight back, oppose, and defend against.

o   Synonyms for “dehumanization” include desensitization, brutalization, and degradation.

o   Therefore, could the phrase be reconstructed in the following ways? – “fight back against the brutalization of black people” or “oppose degradation of black people” or “defend against the desensitization of black people”.

·         What do the terms “virulent” and “permeates” mean?

o   Synonyms for “virulent” include infectious and malicious.

o   Synonyms for “permeates” include infuses and spreads through.

o   In my opinion, “virulent” and “permeates” are suitable adjectives to describe the immoral influence of racism in general.

·         Taken together, it seems reasonable to conclude the following possibilities.

o   BLM seems to advocate for black people having an intrinsic (inherent, fundamental, essential) value. – This is an absolute truth, not because a person is black, but because a person exists.

o   BLM seems to believe that the nature of racism is infectious and malicious. – I agree. Racism unjustly devalues people.

o   BLM wants others to believe that anti-black racism has infused, and is spread through, American society. – I disagree. I can say with confidence that racism does not hold a “spread through” status in every area of American society.

·         In one hand, BLM is attempting to camouflage a vicious act with virtuous intent: stating an objective wrong (anti-black racism is systemic in society, no exceptions) in the name of an objective truth (blacks have the right to live). In the other hand, BLM may be attempting to use illustrative language; stating a subjective belief (racism is everywhere) as a way of couching a commonly held experience (being dehumanized).

 

BLM Position #2

BLM claims to encompass more than “extrajudicial killings of Black people by police and vigilantes”; and affirms the “lives of Black queer and trans folks, disabled folks, black-undocumented folks, folks with records, women and all Black lives along the gender spectrum” and “those that have been marginalized within Black liberation movements.” [4]

·         BLM is reaching out to black people associated with the fringe areas of society that are likely to harbor resentment of the norm.

·         BLM is recruiting to black persons in common society and those aligned to fringe elements in particular.

·         When combined with Position-1, I conclude that BLM intends to provide actionable opportunities for black “fringe” persons to act out in a “legitimate” way. Thus, building their constituent base by leveraging pre-existing hateful attitudes held by some black persons. – This is racism.

 

BLM Position #3

BLM claims to be “an ideological and political intervention in a world where Black lives are systematically and intentionally targeted for demise.” Anti-Black racism permeates American society. Black people face “deadly oppression.” [5] 

·         What does the phrase “ideological and political intervention” mean?

o    Synonyms for “ideological” include philosophical and moral.

o    Synonyms for “political” include governmental and doctrinal.

o    Given prior rhetoric, a synonym for “intervention” is intrusion.

o    Therefore, could the phrase be reconstructed in the following ways? – “philosophical and governmental intrusion” or “moral and doctrinal intrusion”

·         What does the phrase “systematically and intentionally targeted for demise” mean?

o    Synonyms for “systematically” include methodically and steadily.

o    Synonyms for “intentionally” include purposefully and calculatedly.

o    A synonym for “targeted” is directed, and for “demise” is death.

o    Therefore, could the phrase be reconstructed in the following ways? – “methodically and purposefully directed death of Black people” or “steadily and calculatedly directed death of Black people”

·         Taken together, it seems reasonable to conclude the following possibilities.

o   BLM seems to advocate the idea that there is a “governmental and doctrinal intrusion accepted by society where Black people are methodically and purposefully directed to their deaths.”

o   BLM seems to advocate the idea that there is a “philosophical and moral intrusion condoned by society where Black people are steadily and calculatedly directed to their deaths.”

·         These are serious, and sweeping, charges. As a result, BLM is establishing a war-like footing against society at large, and in favor of black persons. – This is racism.

 

A Side Note – Start

I applaud the desire of individual citizens choosing to associate together for the expressed purpose of challenging government authority and/or voicing grievances to the same. – Those are Constitutional rights accorded to all American citizens. – There is little doubt that the accomplishments of the BLM founders, and their close affiliates and supporters, are considerable.

Racism is a decision-making doctrine by which a person or people group makes decisions concerning their interaction with a differing person or people group on the basis of skin color.

However, I am deeply concerned by what I perceive as systemic racism on the part of BLM. I disagree with the notion that vicious beliefs, intentions, or actions become virtuous because they are held and done in the name of justice.

BLM proclaims to be against anti-black racism; and, with equal moral weight, proclaims its intent to be exclusively Black in its beliefs, intentions, and memberships. – Given this arrangement, how can BLM maintain a widely accepted and self-restraining activism without compromising virtue?

·         If both statements coexist with equal moral weight, then what are the limits of right and wrong, good and evil, virtuousness and viciousness?

·         How does BLM measure accomplishment of its objectives?

A Side Note – End

 

Who is Black Lives Matter?

Let’s begin with the founders: Alicia Garza, Opal Tometi, and Patrisse Cullors. Three are activists. Two are writers published with left-leaning periodicals, actual and virtual. One is a community organizer.[6] None practice an analytic or empirical profession. None are aligned with the current norms of government or social institutions.

1.    Alicia Garza (born March 4, 1981) is an American activist and writer. She has organized around the issues of health, student services and rights, rights for domestic workers, ending police brutality, anti-racism, and violence against trans and gender non-conforming people of color. Her writing has been published by The Guardian, The Nation, The Feminist Wire, Rolling Stone, Huffington Post and truthout.org. She is the Director of Special Projects at the National Domestic Workers Alliance.[7]

2.    Opal Tometi is a New York-based Nigerian–American writer, strategist and community organizer. Tometi is a Co-Founder of the Black Lives Matter movement. She is the Executive Director at BAJI (Black Alliance for Just Immigration). Tometi collaborates with staff and communities in Los Angeles, Phoenix, New York, Oakland, Washington D.C. and communities throughout the Southern states. Tometi's work has been published by The Huffington Post, Time Magazine, The Root.[8]

3.    Patrisse Cullors (born 1984) is an American artist and activist from Los Angeles, California, is an advocate for criminal justice reform in Los Angeles and one of the founders of the Black Lives Matter movement.[9]

Regarding rank-and-file membership, the BLM web site makes the following statements:

1.    #BlackLivesMatter creates a “space for the celebration and humanization of Black lives” [10]

2.    BLM Chapters reserve the right to limit participation based on the Black self-determination principle [11]

3.    “…stand with us in affirming Black lives.  Not just all lives. Black lives.”[12]

4.    “…do not change the conversation by talking about how your life matters…” [13]

·         It is clearly stated, #BlackLivesMatter is for “Black lives.”

·         BLM intends to limit membership to black persons of their choosing.

·         BLM limits “affirming” persons to black persons, exclusively.

·         BLM intends to silence moderate messaging and non-conforming dissent.

·         BLM is an organization exclusively for black persons, black membership, and on message black ideas.

 

Why is BLM significant?

In my opinion, BLM is significant for the following reasons.

·         BLM is popular

o   BLM is a popular political activist organization elevated by mainstream media.

o   BLM is the face of a popular social rebellion with intentions to realize revolutionary social effects.

·         BLM is active

o   BLM intends to mount political campaigns to assert the legitimacy and authority of black people, exclusively.

o   BLM is antagonistic, disruptive, and aligned outside social norms.

o   BLM intends to realize its objectives by advocating for new cultural goals to be achieved by new institutional means in order to touch the populace in a radical way.

·         BLM is appealing

o   BLM is a well-organized inter-state organization.

o   BLM is a black people only organization.

o   BLM condemns society at large for institutionalizing the dogma of murdering black people.

·         BLM is dangerous

o   BLM is a racially motivated.

o   BLM believes its principles are philosophically pure and motives morally straight.

o   BLM does not indicate reverence for universal principles, morals, or values.

 

BLM Arrangements

BLM seems showcase several organizational arrangements: real-world action, virtual-world action, affirmation, violence, and opposition.

 

Real-World Action

Real-world action was discussed in the prior sections.

 

Virtual-World Action

BLM states that “#BlackLivesMatter is an online forum intended to build connections between Black people and their allies to fight anti-Black racism, to spark dialogue among Black people, and to facilitate the types of connections necessary to encourage social action and engagement.” [14]

·         It seems reasonable that “#BlackLivesMatter is a virtual/online discussion between persons interacting with the hashtag; and, that BLM intends to use this virtual space as a means to speak and associate. Given these constraints, I have no concerns (see the First Amendment).

 

Violence

BLM claims that #BlackLivesMatter is intended to be a broad “conversation around state violence” with particular interest in “the ways in which Black people are intentionally left powerless at the hands of the state”[15] and “deprived” of their basic human rights and dignity.[16] BLM offers the following examples.

1.    Black poverty and genocide is state violence.[17]

2.    2.8M Black people are locked in cages in this country is state violence. [18]

3.    Black women bearing the burden of a relentless assault on our children and our families is state violence. [19] 

4.    Black queer and trans folks bear a unique burden from a hetero-patriarchal society that disposes of us like garbage and simultaneously fetishizes us and profits off of us, and that is state violence. [20] 

5.    500,000 Black people in the US are undocumented immigrants and relegated to the shadows. [21]

6.    Black girls are used as negotiating chips during times of conflict and war. [22]

7.    Black folks living with disabilities and different abilities bear the burden of state sponsored Darwinian experiments that attempt to squeeze us into boxes of normality defined by white supremacy, and that is state violence. [23]

·         It seems clear that the working definition of “violence” held by BLM needs to be understood. Unfortunately, BLM does not define this term. So, to fill the gap, I offer my own definition.

o   Synonyms for “violence” include ferocity, viciousness, aggression, fighting, and hostility.

o   Physical violence, a component of violence, is a kinetic interaction between opposing forces, actual or virtual. Once implemented, it is explicit, and relatively easy to identify once detected.

o   Political violence, a component of violence, is a coercive interaction between opposing interests. Once implemented, the defeated is forced upon by the victor, and may be difficult to accept after being identified. 

·         What does the term “state violence” mean?

o   Given the “state” qualifier, it seems reasonable to conclude that BLM believes government sanctions aggression, fighting and hostility (characterized by ferocity and viciousness) against black Americans. I am assuming the term “state” refers to “government.”

o   In terms of physical violence, does BLM believe the government is conducting kinetic operations against black people? – Yes.

o   In terms of political violence, does BLM believe the government is coercing black people? – Yes.

·         Given both BLM statements, it seems reasonable to offer the following conclusion.

o   BLM believes black people experience political, economic, and social violence sanctioned by the government; and, black people are powerless to stand against that violence.

o   BLM believes black people experience physical violence sanctioned by the government.

 

Affirmation

BLM seems to establish a recurring theme: affirmation.

1.    “…stand with us in affirming Black lives.  Not just all lives. Black lives.” [24]

2.    “Black Lives Matter affirms the lives of Black …” [25]

3.    “It is an affirmation of Black folks’…” [26]

4.    “We affirm our contributions…” [27]

5.    “…Black women affirming space…” [28]

6.    Queer Affirming [29]

7.    “In affirming that Black Lives Matter…” [30]

8.    Transgender Affirming [31]

What does the term “affirm” (including its various constructions) mean?

·         Synonyms for “affirm” include support and acknowledge.

·         Taken together, it seems reasonable to conclude the following possibilities.

o   BLM seeks to support black persons, black contributions, black women, black gender dysphoria, and itself. – This is racism.

o   BLM seeks to acknowledge black persons, black contributions, black women, black gender dysphoria, and itself. – This is racism.

 

Opposition

BLM does recognize that they will be opposed.  BLM states that “those who benefit directly and improperly from White supremacy to try and erase our existence.” [32]

·         BLM is an anti-white racist movement. – This is racism.

·         BLM believes any opinion not aligned with BLM is attributable to the influence of white persons, past and present. – This is racism.

·         BLM believes actors not aligned with BLM intend to eliminate black people.—This is racism.

 

Your View

Your thoughts and perspectives are important. I invite you to tell me what you believe at samfrescoe@gmail.com. Please check out The Sam Frescoe Project on Facebook.

 

Thank you. – Sam Frescoe

 

© 2016 – SamFrescoeProject.Blogspot.com – All Rights Reserved







































[1] Barbara Reynolds, I was a civil rights activist in the 1960s. But it’s hard for me to get behind Black Lives Matter.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2015/08/24/i-was-a-civil-rights-activist-in-the-1960s-but-its-hard-for-me-to-get-behind-black-lives-matter/ (accessed 160711) ; August 24, 2015


[2] Sowell, Thomas. “The Demagogue’s War on Cops, the war on cops and racial strife are exacerbated by race hustlers and the media.” 12 July 2016. National Review Online









No comments:

Post a Comment